CONTENTSSPORTSBaseballBoys' BasketballGirls' BasketballCross CountryGirls' GymnasticsGirls' Swimming & DivingBoys SwimmingFootballBoys' GolfGirls' GolfBoys' SoccerGirls' SoccerGirls' SoftballBoys' TennisGirls' TennisTrack & FieldGirls' VolleyballWrestlingOTHERMEDIAHeadlinesLive BroadcastsArchived BroadcastsVideo ClipsPhoto GalleriesAnnouncementsTournamentsContent PagesDocumentsForumsPollsScoreboardContact UsRSS FeedIHIGH LINKS |
Home » Football NewsWhich BCS/Playoff System Would Have Worked BestJuly 19, 2012 Eastern Indiana SportsWith the recent announcement of an official 4-team seeded playoff that will begin in 2014 and run for 12 years, I thought it would be a great day to take a step back in time and analyze which would have been the best system (BCS, 4-Team, 8-Team or 16-Team playoff) in the BCS Era (1998-2011). Naturally the main reason I chose just four teams and not eight or 16 was to preserve what I think without question is the best regular season in all of sport! You cannot give me a single plausible argument as to why teams with two or more losses should be given a chance to play for a national title. I think you will find in most years there are three teams that are fighting for those top two spots and as long as you include those teams, I don’t think it really matters as to who is the #4 or #5 team as long as the true deserving teams are in the field. Below is the complete chart of every year from 1998-2011 with a breakdown of how the teams were ranked heading into the bowl games and what each playoff format would have looked like. I used the AP Poll rankings and not the final BCS Rankings because we are heading into a direction where a selection committee will pick the teams and will be much more subjective (like the AP Poll) than a computer ranking. Make sure you are checking out my May 30 Blog which includes what I wrote in this year’s magazine about a Determining a National Championship and also my June 27 Blog which included my original 4-Team playoff argument from 2000.
» Be the first to leave a comment
Comments (0)
|
AnnouncementsPartnerPartner |